The UK Gambling Commission’s latest Gambling Survey for Great Britain (GSGB) has sparked discussion over the potential existence of a substantial unlicensed gambling market in the country. According to the second annual report published on 2 October, the problem gambling rate has risen slightly from 2.5% to 2.7%, indicating that around 1.4 million adults may experience severe gambling-related harms.
While the increase appears modest, analysts and industry experts have questioned whether the survey’s methodology could have inflated figures. Conducted entirely via online and postal methods, the GSGB differs from historical in-person surveys, raising concerns about selection bias. Critics have also pointed to discrepancies with NHS data on problem gambling and related mental health issues, further complicating interpretation.
Some experts, including Dan Waugh from Regulus Partners, suggest that the survey results may imply the existence of previously undetected unlicensed or illicit gambling activity. While not all unlicensed gambling is illegal, certain segments could represent hidden black market activity, unaccounted for in prior estimates. Alternatively, discrepancies may arise from respondents misunderstanding survey questions.
The UK Gambling Commission stresses that the data is crucial for understanding risk profiles among frequent gamblers and encourages operators to consider these insights when implementing player protection strategies. While debate continues over whether the survey reveals a hidden market or reflects methodological limitations, the findings underscore the importance of accurate data in shaping regulation and safeguarding players.
As the industry and policymakers examine these results, the GSGB serves as a pivotal reference point for identifying emerging risks, potential unlicensed activity, and areas where enhanced consumer protections may be required. The survey highlights ongoing challenges in capturing a full picture of gambling behaviour in the UK, prompting renewed focus on regulatory effectiveness and market transparency.
